1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

This court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, since the part of the lawsuit in this case, among the main claims and the conjunctive claims, the part of the claim for confirmation of invalidity of the non-permission disposition as of December 19, 2013, and the part of the claim for confirmation of validity of the non-permission disposition as of July 23, 2013, are unlawful, it shall be dismissed in entirety, and the remainder of the plaintiff's conjunctive claims shall be dismissed as of July

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed because it is without merit.