logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고정1671
모욕등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant publicly insulting the victim by referring to the victim C (the age of 51), the Defendant’s Cheongsung branch of a national bank, the main transaction bank of D Co., Ltd., for which the Defendant works as a director, to the National Bank and the Financial Supervisory Service, from February 26, 2014 to February 14:50 of both weeks, to February 13:50, 2014, the Defendant filed a petition with the National Bank and the Governor of the Financial Supervisory Service, which is the main transaction bank of D, E Co., Ltd., Ltd., the E Co., Ltd., Ltd., in both weeks, to the extent that employees, such as the representative director F, employees G, etc., have been heard, such as the victim’s “new homicide,” the victim’s “fatt fat,” the “ch fat,” the f

2. "2014 high-level 1672".

A. At around 10:00 on January 5, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “The victim is a floto, floto, floto, floto, floto, floto, floto, floto, floto, floto, and floto, floto,” in a situation where employees can hear all.

B. At around 17:00 on February 4, 2014, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by saying, “In a situation where many employees around the said D office are able to hear, the Defendant would be able to publicly insult the victim by saying, “I would like to see the same fluor, why fluor, why fluord. f. f. d. d. d. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.)”

[The record of February 4, 2014 appears to have been out of the office of crime of February 4, 2014, as shown in the record of record of February 4, 2014

A) In light of the following evidence, in light of the structure of the D office, the number of employees, and the criminal time, etc. of the D office, which may be known in light of the following evidence, it appears that other employees could have been aware of such fact at the time of insult of February 4, 2014, public performance is recognized

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Part of the witness C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording records (as of January 15, 2014, February 4, 2014, February 26, 2014).

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts. Article 311 (Selection of Fine)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code and Article 38 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.

arrow