A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2015, at around 09:30, the Defendant suffered from the victim F (70 years of age) in relation to the above church construction work from the third floor of the E branch of the E branch of the Sincheon-gu E branch of the E branch of the E branch of the E branch of the Sincheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and caused the victim to suffer from the injury of the part of the victim's left face of the victim on one occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Results of this court's specialized deliberation and replys to H of the professional examiners of this court;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;

1. A copy of medical records (F);

1. F damaged photographs;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the crime scene;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Judgment on the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The gist of the claim is that the Defendant was engaged in the flabing of the victim at the time of the instant case, and only was flabing the part of the arms, and did not contain the victim’s face as stated in the facts constituting the crime.

2. Of the above evidence, the evidence bearing the highest probative value in relation to the instant case is the result of the fact-finding by the court on the video CD (No. 22 of the evidence list) taken by the victim’s wife at the time of the crime scene and the CT film taken by the victim at the time of visiting the EL General Hospital on the day of the instant case.

According to the video of the video CD (3468-1, 00:26 parts) at the scene of the crime, it is recognized that at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was charged with the injury of the victim, such as the Defendant’s inside of the front 6 weeks and the floor frame of the body of the victim, and recorded the sound suitable for the victim. According to the inquiry of the professional examiner’s inquiry of the CT image of June 23, 2015 by this court, according to the inquiry of the professional examiner’s interview on the CT image of the above CT, it is recognized that the upper part of the CT was observed, and this was read as the bottle for which the time has not elapsed.