logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.12 2017나2884
임금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following order for payment shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is to be stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance deleted from the 15th to the 9th 14th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e

[2] Whether this case’s annual salary system is included in the person who consented to (A) whether the annual salary system is included in the subject of consent (1) where a group of workers is within a single working condition system, even if only a group of workers is directly disadvantaged but it is anticipated that the revised rules of employment will be applied to other workers groups, the group of workers, including a certain group of workers, as well as a workers who are expected to be subject to the revised rules of employment, becomes the subject of consent, and where there is no employee group, other than a group of workers, to whom the revised rules of employment are applied and who are likely to be directly disadvantaged, the revised rules of employment, and where there is no employee group, other than a group of workers, to whom the revised rules of employment are applied, only the group of workers to whom the revised rules of employment would be applied, shall be the subject of consent (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Du2238, May 28, 2009).

arrow