A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 9, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on December 20, 2012, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 6,00,000 by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On September 25, 2013, the Defendant operated a vehicle with blood alcohol concentration of KRW 0.124% from the 150 meters from the Hongsung-gun Hong-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Scar Park, to the 2nd intersection of the 150th Tri-ri intersection.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. A driver's license inquiry;

1. Statement on the circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous conviction in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (hereafter referred to as "driving without a license" in this Article), subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Punishment for a violation of Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed on a violation of the Road Traffic Act of heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Circumstances in which the following reasons for sentencing are described):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the following grounds for sentencing, etc.);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is that the Defendant committed the instant crime at the same time and at the same time, even though he had had had been sentenced to a fine for the same kind of violation of the Road Traffic Act over three times, and the blood alcohol concentration at the time is considerably significant, etc., which are disadvantageous to the Defendant. Meanwhile, the Defendant appears to be against the Defendant in the confession of the instant crime, taking into account the factors of sentencing favorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, etc.