beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 28,083,025 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from November 11, 2015 to November 16, 2017; and
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to AWW and B B truck, and the Defendant is the insurer who has concluded the automobile insurance contract with respect to CBS and passenger cars.
B. On February 17, 2015, at the end of February 17, 2015, the one-lane truck drivened by D (hereinafter “victim”) runs along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the one-lanes located in the one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one road, following the one-way one-way one passing through the one-way one tunnel, resulting in the one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one
(hereinafter referred to as “accident in transit”). The low-priced car driven along a one-lane is moving to the right by snow, and is proceeding to the right.
In order to see the back part of the above one truck to the right side of the two-lanes of the running direction, the one stop in the reverse direction of the two-lanes. The two-lanes of the two-lanes of the one stop, and the other finds the one stop in the front side of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the one-lane truck, and the other tried to see the front part of the one-lane truck in the right side.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). Detailed circumstances about the instant accident are as shown in the attached Form.
C. A victim of a prior accident and the instant accident was diagnosed by the pelvis-gu (No. 2 and No. 3) and was hospitalized from February 27, 2015 to June 16, 2015.
On June 15, 2015, the Plaintiff paid the victim KRW 56,166,050 as medical expenses by November 11, 2015, the sum of KRW 11,166,050 as the insurer of the low-end passenger vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 7, Eul evidence 1-1 to 36, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence and scope of the right of indemnity;
A. According to the occurrence of the liability for damages and the recognition of the limitation, the instant accident neglected the duty of maintaining safe distance for automobiles with low-speed automobiles, electric poles, and safe distance, which were driven without sufficiently putting the road on the snowway.