logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017가단12373
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 80,000,000 to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 23, 2017 to September 6, 2017.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion, such as the statement in the attached Form for the judgment on the claim of the plaintiff succeeding intervenor, can be acknowledged by considering the whole purport of the pleadings in Gap or evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including paper numbers). Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff succeeding intervenor the money as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant on the premise that the plaintiff's claim is no longer a creditor since it transferred the plaintiff's claim against the defendant to the plaintiff succeeding intervenor during the proceeding of the lawsuit in this case, and thus it is no longer a creditor.

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim of this case by the plaintiff succeeding intervenor is justified, and the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow