Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in the operation of CNW EF rocketing vehicles.

On December 6, 2015, the Defendant continued to run approximately 61-70km each hour, depending on two-lanes of the court from the remote distance room in Suwon-si, Suwon-si on December 6, 2015.

The driver did not discover the victim D(63) who crosses the road without permission from the right side of the course to the left side while neglecting his/her duty of care to view the front side and drive the road, and did not discover the victim D(63) who crosses the road without permission from the right side of the course, and caused the part of the victim's bridge to the front part of the above vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, such as the so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called the victim's blood transfusion, which requires continuous and stable medical treatment between several months by occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A medical opinion, an investigation report (a report accompanied by a medical certificate, etc. of the victim D);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on black stuffs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and his/her defense counsel regarding Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act concerning the confinement of the workhouse, the Defendant and his/her defense counsel did not violate his/her duty of care in the former, and the latter is also domestic affairs.

Even if the cause of the instant accident is solely based on the negligence of the victim, it asserts that the cause of the instant accident is not related to the injury of the victim.

살피건대, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 사정, 즉 ① 피고인이 이 사건 교통사고 발생장소인 교차로 진입 당시 교차로 신호등이 녹색 등이었으나, 피고인이 진행하던 도로의 4 차로 중 1, 3, 4 차로에 있는 차량은 모두 브레이크를 켠 상태로 정지해 있었던 점, ② 피고인이 녹색 등 임에도 1, 3, 4 차로...