logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2016.05.10 2015고단1127
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A special intimidation: (a) the Defendant takes the blade (34 cm in total, 21 cm in length, 21 cm in length) prepared in advance on September 9, 2015 for the reason that he/she was found at the home of the victim D in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group C and did not refund the advance payment paid to his/her new victim (21 cm in length) around September 17:50, 2015; and (b) the Defendant refers to the victim.

Finally, there has been a end.

When today's resolution is known, it will not be terminated.

The end is the death of the last place.

At present, there have been a death and death of himself and a end.

At present, 3rds made the word “.........”

Accordingly, the defendant carried a knife, which is a dangerous thing, and threatened the victim.

2. On September 17:50 on September 17, 2015, the Defendant driving a eF cattle in the section of approximately 6 km from the street to the said efnata without obtaining a driver’s license for a vehicle from the street in front of the training place located in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul, to the said training place.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. Seizure records;

1. Related photographs (the second fact in judgment);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses of motor vehicles (the defendant and his/her defense counsel held that the defendant has a knife but take the knife of the victim;

It argues that there is no stimulative or intimidation speech.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, ① the Defendant himself recognizes the fact that the Defendant had a knife in order to put the knife to the victim, ② the Defendant is in possession of the knife at the back knife of the victim and her husband F in dialogue with the victim and her husband at the back knife of the victim, and the victim takes the knife at the back knife of the back knife.

As the statement was made by the Defendant in a grass forest, it does not specify the statement, but the situation before and after the time (the victim cited the knife and threatened the Defendant at the time).

arrow