beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. There is no dispute between the parties to the facts of recognition, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 1-1, 2, and 3 as a whole, Eul (formerly named: D) transferred the above 79,290,790 won to the defendant on the same day after termination of the insurance contract on June 7, 2012, and after receipt of KRW 79,290,790 on the same day, at the post office located in Kimhae-si on February 29, 2012, the fact that Eul (formerly named: D) purchased two units in the post office in which the principal insured, the beneficiary at maturity, and the beneficiary at the time of arrival and disability due to hospitalization and paid KRW 81,01,00 on the same day as the insurance premium at the post office S. P. A, the beneficiary at the time of death, and the beneficiary at the time paid KRW 201,292,290,790 on the same day. The plaintiff is the defendant's head of Changwon and the defendant Seoul District Court may find divorce 22312,222222,231.
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion
A. The Plaintiff asserted that: (a) around February 29, 2012, the business for which post office installment savings will be renewed upon maturity, the Plaintiff intended to subscribe to “Class 1” in accordance with the direction of the head of the post office of Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, but entered into a contract with the contractor and the insured as his/her wife C, and paid KRW 81,00,000 as a lump sum.
However, the defendant made verbal abuse and assault to C and made it confirmed to be owned by the plaintiff later at any time, and agreed to return D at any time, and made D withdraw KRW 79,290,790, which deducts the cancellation of the above pension insurance and various fees, and had D transfer it to its account.
Therefore, since the above KRW 79,290,790 is clear that it is owned by the plaintiff, the defendant is obligated to pay the above money to the plaintiff under the above return agreement.
B. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is that the Defendant was transferred KRW 79,290,790 by verbal abuse and assault to C, or that the Defendant was actually raised with the Plaintiff’s funds, if it is apparent that the said KRW 79,290,790 was actually raised by the Plaintiff, the said money will be returned to C or the Plaintiff.