logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.06.15 2017고단806
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(우범자)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 10, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a person suspected of having committed an act of violence), carried with his/her mother and carried out alcohol differently from his/her mother as a result of the personal taxi trade in North-gu B and on the road in Yanan-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Yan-gu, Yan-si, and carried around the surrounding areas, with the transition (23 cm in total length, 12.5 cm in length on the knife) that is a dangerous object that may be used for violence

2. On March 11, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties: (a) a defect in warning that the knife, which is a dangerous object for which the knife E is discovered, sent to the site upon receipt of the 112 report, would throw away the knife at around 00:20 on March 11, 201; (b) a defect in warning that the knife, which is a dangerous object for which the knife E is discovered, sent to the site after receiving the 112 report; and (c) a public official who is the police, interferes with the lawful performance of duties concerning the handling of the report by E 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records of seizure, lists of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Articles 144(1) and 136(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of special official duties) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 7 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the point of carrying dangerous objects) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The circumstances that are disadvantageous to the sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act: considering the patterns and methods of each of the instant crimes, etc., the crime is very bad, and the circumstances that may have been likely to result more badly: The defendant's mistake is contrary to the recognition of the error; the defendant's report is made to the 112 that "the defendant himself is driving along a knife with a knife"; the defendant is treated with mental illness such as shock control disorder; and the above circumstances are revealed in the trial process of the instant case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family relationship, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

arrow