A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 666"

1. On March 24, 2014, at around 19:35, the Defendant, along with C on March 24, 2014, was parked in the central apartment B Dong parking lot located in Pyeongtaek-si 63-14, the victim D, who had been parked therein, was removed from the victim’s eITY100,000, prepared one truck, and was loaded together with the victim’s intention.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to steal the victim's property in collaboration with C, which was attempted to commit the attempted crime.

"2014 Highest 811"

2. Around 17:30 on March 23, 2014, the Defendant, along with C, told Defendant C, at the H convenience point in the operation of the Victim G (Age 67) located in Pyeongtaek-siF, with the victim I (age 19). On the ground that C, with the victim’s fright, she dumpeded the victim’s fat, and dumped the victim’s fat, she dumpdddddd the victim’s fat, she dumpdddd the victim’s fat, and dumd the victim’s fat, she dumd the victim’s fat

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. On-site photographs of the damaged ozone layers;

1. A complaint;

1. A written statement G and I;

1. Application of CCTV-cape Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 342, 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the points of attempted special larceny), Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the points of joint assault) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Even though the criminal records related to the larceny have been two times, the Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act, again committed a crime of attempted special larceny of this case and joint assault, there is a need for the corresponding punishment due to the negligence of the crime.

However, the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit the crime, is detained for a certain period, has an opportunity to reflect, and C, an accomplice, has led the crime.