The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in full view of the following factors: (a) the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case; (b) the defendant has committed the crime of this case; (c) some of the other person's things were stolen due to his living conditions; (d) some of the damaged items were favorable to the defendant; (e) there were two kinds of records favorable to the victim; and (e) the defendant again committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime; (e) the defendant committed the crime of this case against many victims during a short period of time; (e) the amount of damage exceeds KRW 36 million; (e) the damage amount exceeds KRW 36 million; (e) the defendant was not recovered separately; (e) the court below was already sentenced to punishment in full consideration of the above circumstances; and (e) there was no change of circumstances that differs from the judgment of the court below; and (e) the defendant's age, character, character and environment, relationship with victims, relationship with victims, motive, means, results, and circumstances after the crime of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.