logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.08.14 2019고단1173 (1)
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:30 on April 21, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stated that the said C does not give any other reflect in the 'D’ restaurant operated by Sungnam-si A; (b) opened a 'D’ restaurant with a c’ container, and was in the course of the c’s string, the victim E (38 years of age) who is an infant of C, and the c’s E while in the course of the cing, opened the c’s string, opened the victim’s face over the floor, opened the victim’s face on one occasion with her head, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as the closure and string of the 14 days in need of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Damage photographs and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are the majority of the criminal records of the same kind, and the crime of this case is highly likely to be subject to criticism due to a crime during the suspension of execution.

However, the fact that the defendant is recognized as committing the crime of this case and is against the victim, that the victim does not want to punish the defendant, and that the degree of the injury of this case is relatively minor is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, the environment, the motive, means and result of the crime of this case, and the circumstances shown in pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

On April 21, 2019, the Defendant stated that the victim C(64 years of age) in the 'D' restaurant operated by Sungnam-si A(the 64 years of age) in Sungnam-si A does not give any other side, and that the victim E(the 38 years of age) and the climbed in the city, while the victim E(the 38 years of age) and the crobbbbbing, the victim C's bridges the face, and the police officer called the victim's face.

arrow