A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 21, 2010.

[2011Gohap35]

1. Around August 10, 2009, C asked E to receive a refund of KRW 120 million from the purchase price of the planned real estate purchased by oneself, which he/she had been aware of at least 10,000,000,000 won. He/she requested F to resolve the above problem.

Around that time, F asked the Defendant to “A person who wants to purchase planning real estate that has no possibility of development due to fraud to the real estate development business operator, and can receive the purchase price.” The Defendant stated that F “A request the public prosecutor or investigator working in the prosecutor’s office to collect money from the public prosecutor or investigator in a manner of stamp investigation by requesting the public prosecutor or investigator working in the prosecutor’s office to do so,” and received eight million won as teaching expenses from C on August 18, 2009.

Accordingly, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials.

2. Around September 2009, the Defendant received the Defendant’s “H” office in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government through the above F to receive and deliver the unpaid claim amounting to KRW 14 million from the Defendant’s “H” office. The Defendant received money from the Plaintiff in the same manner as that set forth in paragraph 1, and the Defendant changed the expenses for the test to receive money, and received money from I to the Defendant’s account under the name of the Defendant (UFJ) on the pretext of teaching expenses.

Accordingly, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials.

3. Upon receipt of a request from E to “be able to get off state-owned land located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government” from E at the place described in paragraph 2 of the Haman on September 2009, and from F, the Defendant is a public official in charge of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office.”