1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, with respect to the Plaintiff, KRW 200,000 and its related thereto from August 18, 2013 to December 10, 2015.

1. There is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim, or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the entries in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the plaintiff may recognize the fact that the plaintiff lent 2 million won to the defendant on April 19, 2010 and 1.5 million won thereafter. Thus, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff the above sum of 3.5 million won and damages for delay, unless there are special circumstances.

2. The defendant's assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff’s debt amount by reducing the amount of the said loan amount to three million won, and then, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff transferred the amount of the loan amount to KRW 2.3 million from November 7, 201 to June 19, 2012, and paid KRW 500,000 in lieu of the Plaintiff, and that the said debt amount was extinguished by having the Plaintiff repaid the said loan amount to the Plaintiff at the same time with the said advertisement progs C, together with the said advertisement progs.

B. In full view of the purport of the argument as a result of the order to submit financial transaction information to the president of the Korea Post, the original Defendant agreed to pay the loan amount of KRW 3 million on October 13, 201 and KRW 500,000 after deducting the loan amount of KRW 500,000 from KRW 40,000,000,000 to the new bank passbook in the name of the Plaintiff’s father’s wife, KRW 30,000,000 on December 7, 2011; KRW 130,000,000 on January 7, 2012; KRW 300,000 on January 7, 2012; KRW 50,000 on March 16, 2012; and KRW 300,000,000 on June 19, 200 for each of the Plaintiff’s notes to the Defendant.