logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.07.02 2015고단616
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 18, 2015, from around 18:40 to 19:00 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business, the Defendant: (a) was unable to enter customers who want to enter the said restaurant by avoiding disturbance by exposing the disturbance, such as taking the face of the E having a large amount of hen while drinking in the D cafeteria operated by the victim C (n, e.g., 39 years of age) in the state of being drunkd with alcohol; and (b) destroying the e face of the Defendant at one time in his hand; and (c) destroying two chemical parts in the stairs.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. At around 19:10 on the same day, the Defendant damaged public property: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of interference with business by the Presidential F of the Gyeonggi Bupyeong Police Station, who was called up after receiving 112 a report, and was transferred to the said police station after getting off the G patrol vehicle and getting off the G patrol vehicle and moving to the said police station, the lower door of the back seat of the patrol vehicle’s right side was displayed, thereby impairing its utility in a way that the repair cost would be 95,700 won.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the utility of goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of written estimates to patrols;

1. Articles 314 (1) and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination on the application of the sentencing criteria under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to the provisional payment order: It shall not be applicable;

arrow