Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (amounting to four million won) is too unreasonable.
2. According to the arguments and records of the instant case, the lower court appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering the grounds for sentencing asserted by the Defendant, and there is no special circumstance to the extent that the sentencing will be changed ex post facto.
3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and thus, it is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Provided, That in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, it is ex officio, and in front of the column for “criminal facts” of the lower judgment, “the Defendant was sentenced to six months by imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Eastern District Court on May 19, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 22, 2017.
“A summary of evidence” and “a summary of evidence” are as follows: “A copy of the Supreme Court’s search table (Seoul Eastern District Court 2017No. 7577), “A copy of the Seoul Eastern District Court 2016 High Order 3222 Decided the Seoul Eastern District Court 2016 High Order 322,” and “a relevant legal provision and choice of punishment for facts constituting a crime of 1.” and “a correction is made by adding each of “1.0 after Article 37 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 39(1).”