All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1’s misunderstanding of facts: Defendant 1’s writing on March 14, 2016, which was written solely for the public interest and did not aim to slander a competitor. 2) Unfair sentencing: The lower court’s punishment (fine 300,000) is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor 1: The content of the comments on March 15, 2016, prepared by the Defendant, on March 15, 2016, indicates facts that may undermine the victim’s social evaluation. 2) Unfair sentencing: The lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court also asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s above assertion and convicted the Defendant of the facts charged, by providing a detailed statement on the determination of the lower court.

In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, i.e., the defendant mentioned the victim B Co., Ltd., a victim who is not related to the E press article as of March 14, 2016, 2016, 3. The defendant concealed the defendant and prepares the above comments; 4. The defendant used excessive expressions such as "the feute fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe f).