(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.18 2017고단1308

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.18 2017고단1308

컴퓨터등사용사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 27, 2016, the accused was working for the accused on September 27, 2016.

The victim CO, an operator of CN, issued a mobile phone (CP) that restricts the Defendant’s function of telephone conversations and text message delivery to enable the Defendant to use the mobile phone to pay a small amount of the mobile phone using it, with the intent of inducing the Defendant to use it, and entered the date of birth of the victim who was aware of the date of birth of the victim into the mobile phone “user center” case, and accessed the victim’s establishment of settlement blocking the settlement of the small amount set up by the victim, and continuously terminated the settlement blocking of the amount set up by the victim, using the mobile phone’s settlement function. From that point to October 3, 2016, the victim paid a small amount of money equivalent to KRW 79,810 won at the market price over 13 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes, from that point.

As a result, the defendant obtained financial benefits equivalent to 779,810 won by inputting information into smartphone, which is the information processing unit, without authority.

2. On July 30, 2016, the defrauded Q Q sought “all Bable Account” in the Internet website “A item” by the Defendant.

The phrase " shall be reported," and the victim shall contact with the victim with a cell phone, and "131,300 won shall be transferred to the Mable Account to the effect that the remittance would be avoided."

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant was thought that he would receive money from the victim to use it as living expenses, etc., and the Defendant did not hold the “bable” account sought by the victim, so even if he received money from the victim as the transfer price of the “bable” account, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to transfer it to the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim by such a method and used by the defendant from the damaged person.

F The Saemaul Treasury Account (U) in the name of the F.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2016.06.23 2014고단3144

-광주지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고단1966

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.02.07 2017고단78

-부산지방법원 2017.11.13 2016고단5913

-전주지방법원 2018.11.19 2018고단1301