1. As to the real estate stated in the separate sheet to the Plaintiffs, the Defendant is based on sale and purchase on October 20, 2014.

1. According to the reasoning of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number), witness D's testimony and pleading as to the plaintiffs' claim, the plaintiffs purchased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the real estate of this case") from the defendant on October 20, 2014 from the purchase price, and the plaintiffs provided the defendant with the obligation to pay the lease deposit amount of KRW 60 million on the purchase price, KRW 60 million ( KRW 5 million on October 17, 2014, KRW 500,000 on October 20, 2014, KRW 30 million on the intermediate payment of KRW 7, 2014, and KRW 50 million on November 28, 2014, KRW 500,000 after deducting the lease deposit amount of KRW 3.4 million on the real estate of this case for which the plaintiffs agreed to succeed from the defendant, and thus, the defendant provided the plaintiffs with the ownership transfer registration procedure of KRW 1.5 million on November 28, 2014 million.

(B) On February 2, 200, the Defendant stated the sales price of the instant real estate as KRW 63 billion under the sales contract, and the actual sales price was KRW 6.3 million, and the Plaintiffs did not pay KRW 3 million out of the remainder, and thus the Plaintiffs’ claim is unjustifiable. However, the facts that the sales price of the instant real estate was 600 million as seen earlier are insufficient to reverse the above recognition. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs’ claim against the Defendant is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.