logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.25 2015구합64351
공립 중등교감 자격연수 대상자 제외처분 취소 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the revocation of the disposition, excluding the Plaintiff, by a person subject to qualification training as an assistant principal of a public middle school in 2015.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 20, 1987, the Plaintiff acquired a middle school teacher qualification and started working as a middle school teacher on September 1, 1989, and obtained a first-class regular teacher qualification on August 27, 1994, and served as Chigh School teacher at present.

B. In order to select a person eligible to be qualified as a middle school principal at the end of 2014, the Defendant demanded a middle school teacher within the competent office of education to submit an interview document to select a person eligible to be qualified as a middle school principal through the principal, and accordingly, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant the data, such as a rating slip, through the Chigh School principal.

C. On February 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) notified the Plaintiff of the designation of a person eligible for an interview examination to select a person eligible for an interview to be qualified as an assistant principal during the year 2015, by excluding the Plaintiff from those eligible for an interview to be selected as an assistant principal during the year 2015 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the lawsuit of this case is lawful

A. Of the instant lawsuit, the part seeking revocation of the disposition except the Plaintiff (ex officio determination) from the person subject to qualification training as an assistant principal of a public middle school in 2015, the Plaintiff excluded the Plaintiff from the subject to interview to select a person subject to qualification training as an assistant principal of a public middle school in 2015 due to the Defendant’s instant disposition, but the Plaintiff was selected from among those subject to the above interview examination in 2015. However, the subject of qualification training as an assistant principal of a public middle school in 2015 was designated from among those subject to the above interview, and the instant disposition was also a disposition excluding the Plaintiff from those subject to qualification training as an assistant principal of a public middle school in 2015. Accordingly, the revocation of

However, on February 6, 2015, the defendant only designated a person subject to an interview examination to select a person subject to an interview examination during the year 2015, and at the same time notified him/her of the designation.

arrow