logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.18 2017고단7207
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall lend or lend any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising compensation therefor.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was promised to receive KRW 2 million on the condition that he/she lends his/her physical card under the name of the Defendant from a person in non-name from October 31, 2016 to November 2 of the same year;

2. Around the time, Osan-si, No. 2 and 4 B01, an employee who sent the above name in front of the road, was using a physical card connected to the account of the defendant's name (C) to the bank account of the defendant, and informed the above name influence to the above name influence.

Accordingly, the defendant agreed to receive compensation and lent the access media for electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (the result of execution of a warrant of search and inspection);

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. The crime of lending an access medium under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the custody of the workhouses is a means to facilitate other crimes committed against many unspecified persons, such as Bosing, etc. The fact that the physical card offered by the Defendant was actually used for the crime of Bosing, which actually iced the loan, and that the Defendant reflects the wrongness of the Defendant.

arrow