A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Criminal facts

At around 06:20 on July 25, 2010, the Defendant, on the ground that there was a remainder of misunderstanding that the victim C’s “D organization” office (hereinafter “D organization office”) managed by the victim C was locked, thereby damaging the part of the window of the above toilet with a erode, which is a dangerous object, and at the same place around 15:50 on the same day, on the ground that there was a harmony about the fact that the Defendant was investigated by the police station due to the foregoing reason, and damaged the above toilet with a erode, which is a dangerous object, to the repair cost of KRW 1,054,800 on the ground that there was a erode.g., the window of the above toilet.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. A report on investigation;

1. On-site and photographs of criminal tools;

1. Application of an invoice statute;

1. Relevant Articles 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment in accordance with Articles 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, which increases concurrent crimes;