(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.29 2019가단5150958

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.29 2019가단5150958

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,00,000 and its annual rate from July 19, 2019 to May 29, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and C are legally married couple who filed a marriage report on October 13, 2018 and maintained a de facto marriage relationship on October 13, 2018.

B. From February 17, 2019 to the same year, the Defendant was in school with C.

4. The same year since around 20.20, even though C became aware of his/her spouse;

7.1. Until January 1, 200, the teaching system continued, such as sexual intercourses with C.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry and video of Gap's evidence 1 through 7, 9, 10 (including each number), Eul's witness's partial testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant committed an unlawful act with C while knowing that he/she has a spouse in a de facto marital or legal relationship with C, thereby infringing on or maintaining the common life of the plaintiff and C (including the period in which he/she was in a de facto marital relationship) and infringing on the rights of the plaintiff's spouse. Thus, the plaintiff is liable to compensate for mental damage suffered by the plaintiff

In full view of the following circumstances, the aforementioned evidence and evidence Nos. 1 through 6, i.e., the marriage period of the Plaintiff and C, the contents and period of fraudulent act, the degree of infringement of the Plaintiff’s marital life, C’s confusion with the Defendant on April 20, 2019, where the Plaintiff and C did not express her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her marriage report at that time, and C did not report her her her her her her her her her her her her marriage report state at that time, and rather, C appears to have tried to rectify the Defendant’s remaining her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers

Therefore, it is true.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2018.10.24 2018나45558

-인천지방법원 2017.10.18 2017가단222312

-청주지방법원충주지원 2020.05.28 2020가단20169

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.09 2020가단5069386

-수원지방법원안양지원 2015.02.12 2014가단18061