1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the plaintiffs which rejected compulsory execution below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasons why this court should explain are as follows: (a) to delete the part of the "3. Conclusion" among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) to add the following contents to that part, the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) to this end,

2. The portion of the appeal shall be paid by the Defendant to the Defendant, on December 16, 2008, KRW 1 million, KRW 1 million on January 29, 2009, KRW 2,851,556 on February 23, 2009, KRW 522,570, KRW 2,328,986 on the ground that the Defendant received reimbursement from the Plaintiffs, from the Plaintiffs, and appropriated each of these expenses for KRW 522,570, KRW 2,328,986, KRW 7,652,644, and KRW 522,570 from February 24, 2009 to the date of full payment. Therefore, the Defendant’s debt against the Defendant shall be paid as follows, and damages for delay shall remain at the rate of KRW 35% per annum from February 24, 2009 to the date of full payment.

Therefore, the execution power of the final and conclusive judgment of this case shall be excluded only from the amount exceeding 35% per annum from February 24, 2009 to the date of full payment, with respect to KRW 7,652,644 and KRW 522,570 among them.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition and the remainder shall be dismissed. Since the judgment of the court of first instance which has concluded a different conclusion is unfair, part of the plaintiffs' appeal shall be accepted and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be modified as per Disposition.