logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2012.12.05 2012고정1470
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won, and a fine of 700,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Although Defendant A was prohibited from selling alcoholic beverages to juveniles under the age of 19, Defendant A, while operating a general restaurant of the trade name called Eunpyeong-gu E, Defendant sold to F (17 years of age) a total of KRW 18,000,00, which is a harmful juvenile product, to juveniles, around March 18, 2012.

2. At around 00:00 on March 19, 2012, Defendant B, the Defendant: (a) Had the victim H and A, the head of the above head of the head office with G, F and Si expenses, who performed drinking on the side tables in the above “E”, shall restrain the Defendant; (b) the defect “I am to this effect; (c) whether I am to perform funeral in the solitary form; (d) whether I am to the end of the judgment; and (d) whether I am to the end of the judgment, I am to the end of the judgment; and (e) if I am to the end of the judgment, I am to the end of the judgment, I am to the end of the judgment, and interfere with the normal business operation of the restaurant operated by the above victims.”

Summary of Evidence

【Criminal Facts of Paragraph 1 at the Time of Sales】

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A written statement in F and G preparation;

1. A copy or receipt of a business report;

1. On-site photograph [the crime of paragraph (2) at the time of sale];

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective statutory statements of witness A, H, G, and F to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 51 subparagraph 8 of the Juvenile Protection Act and Article 26 (1) (Selection of Fine): Defendant B: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine);

1. Determination as to the Defendants’ assertion of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act and their defense counsel

1. Defendant A examined the identification card before providing alcohol to juveniles F, and Defendant A asserts to the effect that F was deemed not a juvenile by presenting an adult identification card, and that F was not a juvenile, and that F was not a juvenile.

The following shall be revealed by the evidence admitted above:

arrow