A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On June 25, 2019, the Defendant, at around 13:25, 2019, was required to comply with a drinking test by inserting a part of the motor vehicle driven by E while driving the D with the vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the front of the Cridge in the front of the 112-round city in the front of the 2019-round Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and receiving a 112 report, to be considered to have driven the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as a slope G belonging to the F Zone of the Donsan Police Station in the Jeonnan, the Hansan Police Station in the front city, and a Hah H in the face, and making it possible for the Defendant to be deemed to have driven the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 놓는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

The defendant is a person who was indicted on July 25, 2019 to the Jeonju District Court for the non-detained of the violation of the Road Traffic Act and is currently pending trial.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 13:06 on July 19, 2019, the Defendant was required to comply with a drinking test by inserting a drinking measuring instrument three minutes at intervals of about five minutes at a distance of five minutes, for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, while driving a D D low-priced motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the front of the front of the front city, while obtaining a driver’s vehicle from J and receiving a report of 112; and (b) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol from K and K of the F Zone of the Jeonnan Police Station F Zone in the Jeonnan Police Station in the front of the front city, the Defendant was in the influence of alcohol while driving a D high-priced motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the front of the front of the

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) or 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

[2019 Highest 1191]

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.