A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment by the Incheon District Court for interference with the performance of official duties, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju Prison on July 19, 2016.

[2] The Defendant, on October 08, 2016, at around 01:20, received a report from the Defendant to the effect that “D,” in front of “D” located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and “D,” and received a report from the Defendant 112, demanded the Defendant to voluntarily accompany the case, and the Defendant demanded the Defendant to appear on the next day, on the ground that the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant demanded the Defendant to voluntarily accompany the case; (c) on the ground that the Defendant: (d) the Defendant would not arrest a low person on the following day on the ground that he was on duty.

Chewing A. The police officer's Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

“Avoking a bath,” and intended to cross the road without permission, and this G interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer in relation to the handling of reporting duties, i.e., the Defendant’s body, and the Defendant’s body. “Avoking to breath”, “Avoking to breath”, “Avoking to breath the face of G one time per week,” “F’s face was prevented at one time,” and at one time, F’s face was re-shicked three times, and the Defendant’s face was obstructed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Statement made by the F and G police statements;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the details of CDs and caps;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [the scope of recommendations] The reason for the sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [the punishment of this case] is that the defendant has already been subject to criminal punishment several times, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being contradictory to the period of repeated crimes, in addition, even though he was sentenced to criminal punishment for the same crime.