logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.01.14 2015나2536
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. Around November 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract with the Defendant that the Plaintiff entrusts the Defendant with the preparation of a business plan necessary for obtaining a construction waste disposal business license (hereinafter “instant contract”) and paid the Defendant the down payment amount of KRW 4 million on the same day.

The contents of the above contract included an agreement to the effect that “If the design or business plan in the business plan is not consistent with the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes and is notified of improper matters, the Defendant shall prepare supplementary documents and deliver them to the Plaintiff” (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

B. On October 28, 2013, the Plaintiff submitted a construction waste interim disposal business plan prepared by the Defendant to an administrative agency on two occasions, but received a request for supplementation from an administrative agency on January 9, 2014, and received a request for supplementation to submit an active preventive measure to suppress environmental pollution, such as dust and noise, to the maximum extent possible, ② submitting a report on the business of producing scattering dust, ③ submitting a revised report on the installation of wastewater discharge facilities, ④ submitting documents verifying whether the use of a building in a factory site can be changed, ⑤ submitting a revised report on the installation of wastewater discharge facilities, ④ submitting documents verifying whether the use of a

C. On January 20, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted supplementary documents prepared by the Defendant to the competent administrative agency, but was notified by the administrative agency that the period for supplementation would be extended on the same day on the grounds of “a supplement of construction permission, etc.” and submitted supplementary documents, such as a construction permit for the change of use prepared by the Defendant, to the administrative agency on February 24, 2014, but was notified by the administrative agency on March 4, 2014 that “a redesign, etc. of waste disposal facilities and air pollution prevention facilities, etc.” should be extended on the grounds of “a redesign, etc. of waste disposal facilities and air pollution prevention facilities, etc.” and the construction waste disposal facilities prepared by the

arrow