logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.31 2019고정462
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a BFIS car on duty.

On November 23, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 13:50 on November 23, 2018, while driving the C apartment distance in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City in the direction of the C apartment shooting distance from the seat of the D apartment shooting distance, and changed the vehicle line from the first lane to the second two lanes.

Since there is a white real line where a career change limitation sign is installed, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by not changing course and driving safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the course from the latter three lanes to the second two lanes, and received the left-hand side part of the F Spit vehicle driven by the victim E (year 69) from the latter two lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “influoral salt and tension,” which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A traffic accident investigation report, an investigation report (investigation into an accident), and an accident video CD;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel

1. The Defendant, at the time, changed the vehicle line at a white point section, which is not a white solid line, to wait for the left-hand turn before the right-hand turn-on line. As such, the Defendant changed the vehicle line at a white point section, which is not a white solid line.

2. The following facts or circumstances revealed by the aforementioned evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, namely, the Defendant was not at the interval of three vehicles in front of the vehicle in front at the time, but was located immediately after the vehicle in front (in the investigation of an accident, an accident video CD), and the Defendant was under investigation by the investigative agency at the time.

arrow