logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.22 2016고단9368
사기미수
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is suffering from economic difficulties while bringing China's Dognetism, etc. into a large quantity since several years ago, and keeping the building A 1305, etc. of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building A, and in particular, the bill of indictment written on February 2, 2015 appears to be a clerical error, so it is corrected without changing the indictment to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's defense right.

When acquiring 50 million won from G by deceiving the sources of money and demanding the payment, it was intended to acquire money by selling the money as if it was a sacrificing, with the origin, truth, and sacrifies which are unclear.

Defendant

A around May 2016, at around 1305, the above F building A, the victim H who had been interested in logistics and was found to have been involved in logistics, and “the Dognetism, etc. in this area is the serious thing owned by the president of the City.”

The interest in the purchase of relics seems to have purchased relics.

“The victim is interested and asked whether the victim can seek a non-rest which is a domestic valuable material.” At that time, Defendant A and Defendant B expressed the intent of “the victim to purchase his own will, etc., and sought domestic inequality.”

“To the effect that it was “....”

이에 피고인 B은 그 무렵 2회에 걸쳐 연화대 백옥 금 불상 모조품, 금동 미륵 보살 반가 사유상 모조품 2점을 피고인 A에게 전달하면서 “ 국내 유물로서 진품이고 최하 5억 원의 가치가 있으니 그 정도의 돈을 받아야 한다.

The Defendants conspired to acquire money by deceiving the victim with the intent of “.......”

Accordingly, Defendant A said, at around 14:00 on May 24, 2016, Defendant A stated to the effect that “The 12 points, including the above insane, are all truth, and the approximately KRW 11.2 billion is worth being purchased.”

However, the fact is that the defendants want to sell the goods as maternity, and the defendant B purchased the goods from several years to several hundred thousand won or more, and the authenticity and value of the goods.

arrow