1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except where the court of the first instance renders "marbing" of the second, second, and third of the 7th of the 7th of the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the

1. The Plaintiff asserted to supplement the assertion in the first instance trial, namely, considering the characteristics of the golf course’s work and the role of the general manager, etc., it should be recognized that he worked from 07:30 to 19:30 on an average of 73 hours a week and 15 hours a week during four weeks prior to the occurrence of the instant disease, i.e., the Plaintiff’s chronic department and 72 hours a week average of 72 hours a week during 12 weeks prior to the occurrence of the instant disease, and thus, proximate causal relation exists between the Plaintiff’s chronic department and the instant injury. Even if not, the Plaintiff’s work hours on the Plaintiff’s computer log/rodon record should be recognized to have worked for 8 hours prior to the occurrence of the instant disease, based on the Plaintiff’s average work hours during 17 hours a week prior to the occurrence of the instant injury, and thus, the Plaintiff claimed that the Plaintiff worked for 20 hours prior to the occurrence of the instant disease and 2 hours a week an average of 17 weeks p.

2.Top, stop, amendments.