Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. As a matter of principle, on September 14, 2015, the Korean Democratic Union Federation of Workers (hereinafter “former Union”) agreed on the structural reform of the labor market on the background of the instant case at the Economic and Social Development Committee (hereinafter “Labor and Social Affairs Committee”), the agreement of the labor and management council was strongly contrary to “Empic,” and the agreement of the labor and management council took place in finding a situation where the people’s interest is low and it is difficult to take any longer a strike. Accordingly, the 1st century declared the 1st century and the 1st century in order to make the 1st century and convert the 1st century into the 1st century into the 1st century. The 5th century announced the 1st century by the Seoul National Assembly of Workers and Labor, including the 5th National Assembly of Workers and the 5th National Assembly of Dec. 22, 2015, the 1st century and the 5th National Association of Farmers and the 5th National Association of Workers, including the 5th National Association of M&W.

In particular, after the revision of the public notice related to the correct history textbook of the government on October 12, 2015, the public-private partnership, which secured the power of a new strike called the “public-private partnership against the textbook’s purification,” was able to further strengthen the power of the strike against the “public-private partnership” jointly with the organizations having caused the issue of history textbook nationalization issues. On October 19, 2015, the public-private partnership, which was held on October 19, 2015, held the “Resolution for the Declaration of the General Audit of Labor and Labor,” with the union members belonging to the public-private partnership through the “Resolution for the Declaration of the General Audit of Labor and Labor Relations, for the labor-private partnership, for the labor-private partnership, for the labor-private partnership, and for the democratic labor-private partnership.”