The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On a date that could not be known on 2014, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) entered a written contract for the loan of the above D apartment in the name of the complainant C (hereinafter “the instant transaction agreement”) in lieu of the complainant’s signature without the complainant’s consent; and (b) applied the same method by placing the complainant’s signature on the assembly seal without the complainant’s consent.

B. On May 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) submitted forged documents, as stated in paragraph (a), to the court regarding Incheon District Court 2014Ga group 33184 on May 16, 2014.

2. We examine whether the Defendant forged the instant transaction agreement.

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the complainant was consistently forged the instant transaction agreement from the first accusation of the Defendant to the present court.

On the contrary, the Defendant did not consistently state the date of preparation of the instant trading contract and the details of acquisition in the course of investigation.

In addition, on January 13, 2014, the date of sending facsimile to the apartment sale contract (which seems to have been sent by facsimile) on the 459 pages of the investigation record, is likely to have been prepared prior to the date on which the defendant asserts. The signature and seal of the complainant of the instant transaction contract is somewhat different from the signature and seal of the other contract ( regardless of whether or not the signature and seal of the complainant is authentic, the signature and seal of the complainant are likely to have been written by the complainant) written by the complainant.

I seem to appear.

B. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the following circumstances are also acknowledged.

(1) On July 29, 2015, the complainant prepared a six-party trading contract with the police in relation to a sales contract with the defendant and E.

In the course of the investigation, a variety of contracts have been submitted, and the above contracts have been concluded.