Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who operates a mutual travel will of “H” on the 3th G in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and Defendant A is an employee of Defendant B.

1. The Defendants committed the fraud at H office around March 4, 2014, and Defendant A made a false statement to the victim J, introduced from waer I, in accordance with Defendant B’s instructions, to sell the French Newcompet goods.

However, in fact, it is difficult for Defendant B to distribute funds to the wind of the wedding hall operated separately from H. Defendant A used the sales proceeds of H due to the obligation of the travel agency operated separately prior to H employment. As such, Defendant A operated the travel agency with the word "free from returning" due to the lack of management status of the said travel agency, Defendant B merely thought Defendant B used the travel goods for the expenses of the travelers who entered into the contract before receiving the travel payment from the injured party and did not have the intent or ability to offer the travel goods to the victim.

The Defendants: (a) by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 3,020,000 from the victim to the Daegu Bank Account (Account Number: K) under the name of the Defendant A on the same day; and (b) received KRW 900,000 for travel expenses to the same account around May 9, 2014, in total, KRW 3,920,00 for each remittance.

In addition, the Defendants conspired to commit these crimes from December 2, 2013 to June 3, 2014, and acquired them by obtaining a total of KRW 114,356,000 travel expenses from the victims 59 times in total, as shown in attached Table 1.

2. The Defendants committed the crime of embezzlement at H office around April 13, 2014; Defendant A entered into a detailed travel contract with Defendant B with the victim L, and received KRW 100,000 as travel deposit and received KRW 1,080,000 as travel payment on April 29, 2014, and kept the victim in custody on behalf of the victim.

On June 3, 2014, since a travel contract was canceled with the victim on June 3, 2014, the defendants as the victim is above.