logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.15 2016노8877
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The instant crime committed by the Defendant with payment and transferring an access medium is an act facilitating various criminal acts, such as the so-called “singing” crime using another’s access medium under the name of the third party, and the nature of the crime was very poor when considering the social harm, and the fact that the access medium actually transferred by the Defendant was used for the crime of fraud, etc. is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, in full view of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects against himself, the primary offender, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, background and motive of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the prosecutor's assertion is without merit, since the court below's punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow