beta
Text
The judgment below
Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
, however, the defendant.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants (Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of ten months, with prison labor for a maximum of six months, with prison labor for a short of six months and with prison labor for six months) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. Defendant A committed each of the instant crimes without being aware of the fact that Defendant A received juvenile protective disposition several times from the same thief since 2014, each of the instant crimes appears to have been interviewed with points in the applicable law and professional aspects, and the victim E did not recover any damage up to now, and the victim E expressed its intent to strong punishment because the Defendants were not the initial offender in the course of the investigation.
However, in addition to the favorable circumstances such as the fact that Defendant A acknowledges all of the crimes of this case, and the mistake appears to be divided, the amount of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case is the small amount of damage, the fact that Defendant A is still a juvenile of 17 years old, the mother of Defendant A is leading the Defendant A, and the fact that Defendant A is leading the Defendant A, the sentence imposed by the court below to Defendant A is unfair due to its failure.
B. Defendant B appears to repent of mistake while recognizing all of the crimes of this case. Defendant B appears to have served as a role to the extent that he saw the network in each of the crimes of this case. The amount of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case is a small amount and appears to have been used as living expenses. Defendant B is still the first generation of a society of 20 years old and older, etc. in favor of Defendant B.
However, Defendant B committed each of the crimes in this case with Defendant A, who was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment due to a special larceny with Defendant A, and committed each of the crimes in this case with Defendant A, and no damage has been restored until now.