All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

In light of the overall circumstances of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below on the defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.

However, considering the following circumstances: (a) as to the assertion of unfair sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes using personal trust relationship; (b) the Defendant committed the act of deception by forging documents under the name of another person or preparing false documents; (c) the Defendant was unable to repay most of the money obtained by deception; and (d) the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim; (c) the Defendant has no criminal records of the same kind; and (d) the previous criminal records are only fines; (c) the Defendant is the most responsible for supporting the instant crimes; and (d) other favorable conditions of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, family relation, criminal record, relationship, character and conduct, environment, means and method of the instant crimes; and (e) the motive and circumstance of the instant crimes; and (e) other various sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, family relation, criminal record, character and behavior; and (e) the Defendant’s motive and circumstance after the instant crimes, etc., the Defendant

Therefore, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, the decision of the court below is to change the term "influoral real estate lease contract 12" in Part 2 of Part 4 of the decision of the court below to two copies of the forged real estate lease contract (in Chapter 10, a false real estate lease contract)" and ex officio correction is made in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the