The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of BK(K)7 automobiles.

On January 25, 2012, at around 00:10 on January 25, 2012, the Defendant driving the said vehicle, and driving the two-lanes of the 39th national road in the vicinity of the non-fwing-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si.

Nevertheless, as a driver of the above SM(SM)-5 vehicle under stop due to an accident that occurred on the front section by negligence without performing the above duty of care, the driver of the above SM(SM)-as a driver of the above SM(SM)-as the bridge part of the victim D(43 years old) who was dealing with the accident.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from pulverization of flags by occupational negligence in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment, and then suffered from serious injury, such as causing the victim to suffer physical disability in the right sulp and aftermathic surgery (reflaging and fire extinguishing disorder) due to the above injury.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

(b) Declaration of intention that the victim does not want punishment after prosecution;

(c) Public prosecution dismissal: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;