The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable in light of the fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the fact that the defendant's economic condition is not good.

2. Determination of the facts that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected, and that the defendant's bereaved family does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the bereaved family members of the victim.

However, the court below seems to have determined an appropriate punishment by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant and unfavorable circumstances, and there are no special changes in circumstances that could change the sentence of the court below after the decision of the court below was rendered, the reason for the accident of this case is heavy due to the defendant's failure to perform his duty in the front direction, the crime of this case resulted in the serious result of the victim's death, the defendant has been punished as a suspended sentence for the same crime, other terms and conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, including the defendant's age, sexual behavior and environment, and the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines (the scope of recommended punishment for four months to one year [the range of recommended punishment] [4 months to one year] of general traffic accident mitigation area (including a special aggravated person] [including a serious effort to recover damage], the court below's punishment against the defendant, and it seems that the court below's punishment is unreasonable by taking into account the circumstances of this case's crime of this case, and it seems that the court below's decision is reasonable to dismiss the defendant's community service work work for a reasonable period of three months.