logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단2699
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who was working as the C Branch in around 2010, and the victim B is an employee working at the above branch.

The Defendant around 11:00 on May 18, 2010, at the branch office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D around 11:00, to the victim B (35:35) at the branch office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, “The Defendant is a ship going to the Vietnam Investment Company, which is located in the Vietnam Investment Company, and can make a big profit to the APTPP company.

If a person lends KRW 10 million to another person, he/she intends to purchase the above shares and has money to be paid within one week from his/her birth.

Although the Defendant made a false statement, the Defendant had a debt of approximately KRW 400 million at the time, and the Defendant did not verify whether he/she could lend KRW 10 million to his/her mother, and where he/she did not lend his/her money to his/her mother, he/she was unable to repay the money to the victim and did not have the intent and ability to repay the money to the victim.

After all, the Defendant received a copy of the check from the injured party on May 19, 2010 from the injured party and acquired it.

2. The Defendant, at around 14:00 on January 24, 2013, borrowed money to the victim E (44 tax) who is in the relationship with the wife in the “G office” located in the “G office located in Yongsan-si, 2013, for the Defendant calculated and paid as 10% interest if he/she lent money to the Fund or to make investments in shares, and the principal will be returned after one year.

Although the Defendant made a false statement, the Defendant was making a living by lending approximately KRW 600 million in money from various financial institutions, such as banks, loan companies, etc. while investing in stocks at the time, and there is a possibility that the Defendant may incur loss in the case of investing in stocks with money borrowed from the damaged party due to a bad financial knowledge with a bad experience of working as a bank source. As such, the Defendant made the above promise with the knowledge that the principal and interest may not be repaid to the victim.

arrow