logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.01.17 2013고정1562
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 500,000,00, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates “G” in 204 of the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and Defendant B and C are those who agreed to receive KRW 60,000 per day from October 16, 2012 to receive KRW 60,000 per day from the above game site and work as an employee.

No person shall provide game products for distribution or use which have not been classified, or display or store such products for such purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired in collusion with the Defendants to set up “marine camping out,” which was not rated in the said game room from October 2, 2012 to October 22, 2010, on the 28th unit of Blue PC, and provided a large number of unspecified customers with the method of receiving KRW 3,000 per hour rental fee, and daily rental fee of KRW 20,000.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide the ungraded game products for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs and fluoral display photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written requests for appraisal;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 1 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for negligence;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Defendant A: Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel asserted on the assertion of the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the provisional payment orders asserted that the game products “sea-to-sea” stored in the instant Ampid did not fall under the category classification under the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry, and did not meet

The proviso of Article 21 (1) 4 of the Promotion of the Game Industry Act shall not be subject to self-rating even if the producer of a game product is a game product not permitted to be used by juveniles, and it shall be from the Korea Rating Board.

arrow