logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.5.2. 선고 2018가합484 판결
공사이행
Cases

2018 Gohap484 Implementation of the Project

Plaintiff

A

Defendant

B

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 4, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

May 2, 2019

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim

The defendant shall perform water leakage prevention work with respect to Hosan City C Apartment D, and shall pay KRW 3,550,000 to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

The water leakage in the Da Apartment-si, Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the "the apartment of this case") owned by the Defendant caused damage, such as drinking water, from the apartment site owned by the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to perform water leakage prevention construction on the apartment of this case, and to pay the Plaintiff KRW 50,000,000 and KRW 3,550,000,000,000 to the lessee of this case.

2. Determination

According to the appraiser E's appraisal results, the apartment in this case did not generate water, and the damage to water leakage of the apartment in the plaintiff's possession is acknowledged when the water leakage from the pipe duct (Pipe Duct) inside the apartment is causing damage to the apartment owned by the plaintiff located on the lowermost floor, so it is difficult to view the damage to water leakage of the apartment in this case's possession was caused by water leakage from the apartment in this case's possession, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

Judges Choi Jong-sung

Judges Song Jae-chul

Promotion for Judges

arrow