1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall not exceed KRW 100 million from the plaintiff 80,803.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following changes among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The modified part;

A. The grounds of the judgment of the first instance court No. 1. A are amended as follows:

D on April 5, 201, KRW 40,00,000, KRW 10,000 on April 27, 2011, KRW 1,000,000 on April 27, 2011, and KRW 27,000 on March 26, 2012, KRW 26,025,00 on March 30, 201, and KRW 10,000 on May 9, 2012, KRW 10,000 on June 26, 2012, KRW 40,000 on July 14, 201, KRW 40,000 on July 40, 200, KRW 00 on the loan of KRW 30,00 on March 17, 200, KRW 301 on the loan of each year; and

B. The reasons for the judgment of the first instance court are as follows:

C The “date of satisfaction of performance” of each “date of satisfaction of performance” set out in the separate sheet of calculation of appropriation (except for the sequence 1, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 20, and 22, the “amount of satisfaction of performance” stated in the separate sheet of calculation of appropriation of performance to D was repaid to each party.

C. On June 23, 2014, the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s third page 8 changed “ July 2, 2014” to “ June 23, 2014,” and changed to “80,803,338 won” each for the fifth page 20 and the second page 6.

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed due to the lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance court is unfair with a different conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by accepting part of the plaintiff's appeal and changing the judgment of the first instance as above.