logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.05.12 2014고단1103
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 14, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around 14, 2009, in the “FF” of the victim E’s operation in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) in fact, the Defendant would bring about the said victim’s credit payment on the part of the Plaintiff, despite the fact that the Defendant had a bad credit standing due to the failure of his golf course operation in around 2007, and without any special property, a claim that was held in an amount equivalent to KRW 3 to 4,000,000,000, without any special property, due to the absence of any property from the obligor; and (c) even if the Defendant purchased golf loans from the damaged party, it is objectively impossible to recover the loans, and even if he did not have an intent or ability to normally pay the proceeds, the Defendant would bring about the payment on the part of the Plaintiff on credit

“A false statement” was obtained from the injured party, i.e., from the injured party, a letter of golf loans equivalent to 2.5 million won at the market price, and acquired it by fraud.

2. 피고인은 2010. 12. 15. 경 청주시 흥덕구 H G 동 자신의 주거지에서, 사실 피고인은 위 1 항 기재와 같이 아무런 경제적 자력이 없어 피해자에게 공사를 하게 하더라도 그 대금을 정상적으로 지급할 의사나 능력이 없었음에도 불구하고 이미 2007년 경에 해산되어 존재하지도 않는 I( 주) 의 대표이사 명함과 실체가 없는 ㈜ 남강 골프라고 인쇄된 편지봉투 등을 피해자에게 건네주며 자신이 골프장을 운영하는 재력가인 것처럼 행세하면서 피해자 C에게 “ 우리 집이 아래, 위층 거실이 뻥 뚫려 있어서 추우니까, 춥지 않게 할 방법이 있으면 수리를 해 달라, 돈은 집수리가 끝나면 지불하겠다.

“A false statement,” and the victim did not immediately have the victim complete the construction work, design, distribution, and decoration work in an amount equivalent to KRW 2,458,100 of the construction cost, and the victim did not pay the price.

3. The Defendant is at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2 around December 20, 2010, while the Defendant is at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2.

arrow