logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.28 2019나47690
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff are not different from the allegations made by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial, and even based on the evidence additionally adopted and investigated by this court, the fact finding and judgment by the first instance court on the Plaintiff’s assertion are recognized as legitimate). 2. On 3th of the first instance judgment, the part of the first instance court, which was used or added by the court, divided the number 2,184 square meters in the attached Table into 2,184 square meters, and the land was divided into 2,123 square meters in the attached Table, and the “land was divided into 2,184 square meters in the attached Table” and 2,123 square meters

Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deleted from 7 pages " and the procedure for transfer of ownership".

Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deleted in all "(i) part of the claim for the transfer registration procedure."

3. Accordingly, the plaintiff's primary claim against the defendant is dismissed as it is without merit, and the conjunctive claim is justified as it is. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all the defendant's appeal and incidental appeal are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow