logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.10.25 2013고정2019
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around January 13, 2013, the Defendant connected the Kakaoto Ri of E, a victim D using smartphones used by the Defendant in Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, in order to access the victim D, “D”, which is known to the husband, was known to the female, while the husband remains in a foreign country, she is wind or fright, and she is not the one, but two chron or F, which she has come to the for six years, and she has come to the off, and she has come to the off, and she has come to the off, so she has come to the off, so she has come to the off, and she has come to the off, and if she has come to the off, she has come to the off, not the woman, but the husband has been frighten, and the husband has been aware of the fact that she has become winded to a foreign country, and the victim has been aware of the fact that she has become the victim's reputation during 2 years of E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on screen pictures following a sign language closure;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. and Selection of a fine concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the defendant and defense counsel acknowledged that posting a statement on the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the defendant is not false but true.

According to each of the above evidence in the ruling, the article posted by the defendant can be recognized as false facts because it is not supported by objective and reasonable materials or grounds.

arrow