Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000 (private million).

If the defendant does not pay the above fine in full, 100.

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2014, the Defendant driven a Bolf car as a business of 00:33 on November 16, 2014, and proceeded three-lanes from three-lanes to three-lanes of LH1 complex to the apartment complex from the edge of the main construction works in agricultural and fishing villages at a low speed.

At that time, there is a night and it is anticipated that vehicles are parked and construction materials are loaded on the right side of the road in the vicinity of the construction site. Therefore, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed of driving and prevent accidents by safely driving the front door in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to neglect it and proceed with a shocking and continuing to follow the left side of the DNA car owned by the victim C (Nam, 53 years old) who is parked in three-lanes in the direction of marina course by negligence.

The construction materials owned by the KCAS General Construction Co., Ltd., which were loaded in front of the KCAS vehicle, were re-shamped in front of the right side of the Defendant driver vehicle.

As a result, the cost of repairing the back-to-hand side of the victim C vehicle is equivalent to KRW 3,753,01, and the amount of property equivalent to KRW 200,000, such as the representation owned by the owner of the (judung Construction), was not immediately stopped and necessary measures have not been taken.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect of the police accused;

1. Statement of the police C;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to practical survey reports, traffic accident occurrence reports, traffic accident evidence and photographs, towing vehicle engineers and telephone conversations investigation reports (Evidence List Nos. 3, 4, 5, 14, 24)

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning the facts of crime and selection of fines under Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are not criminal records, and all of the crimes of this case are acknowledged, and confession is made.

However, the damage of the instant case.