The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The argument that the judgment of the court below erred in the violation of the rules of evidence shall not be a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is asserted by the defendant only in the final appeal that there was no ground for appeal, or that there was no ground for appeal that the court below is subject to ex officio

In addition, examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior intelligence and environment, relationship with victims, motive means and consequence of each of the instant crimes, etc., the determination of the lower court’s imprisonment with prison labor for 16 years cannot be deemed extremely unfair even when considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.